That is certainly also plausible. As said in the end para it is possible some in their 20's and 30's are morally unconscious. in their 70's and 80's, as Oppenheimer did, reflected on the ugly mature of what was done. The absence of the notion of Sin (or wrongness) in general should at least be reflected on. What an anonymous target cohort want's is to be treated with dignity and not be gamified, co-opted, or enslaved to subscriptions that are unnecessary and warp what they think is real by injecting fake qualia (you could debate any qualia is fake I accept then we get into the theory of what is reality). If the platforms were architected with avoidance of sin consciously baked into their guiding principles with no CEO/board veto then the digital business models of today would potentially be very different. I don't think it is dreary to debate the merits and reasoning and "sinfulness" of platforms that facilitate suicide or fraud, neither of which is preventable in law these days.